Transparency is important, and we recognize that – it also takes different forms. Aside from the large open sessions this past winter and spring, we often reach out to members directly to ask questions or follow up with individuals or small groups after our meetings. Some of you have received those emails over the last few years from members of our negotiating team. It might be us asking a small group of members to review drafts of agreements that directly pertain to their job(s). It might be us keeping in close contact with some of you during the bargaining process to gather input on counterproposals. It might be us sending out a member-wide survey to ask for your views and hear about your experiences in certain roles. We used this when we renegotiated the faculty leadership positions in 2019-2021, where we pored over the results to gain insights about how to proceed in the bargaining process. Finally, you might notice that our negotiating team members are faculty with different experiences on campus. And they are all involved in campus leadership. We rely heavily on the networks that each of our team members has built to connect informally to many of you. We do our best to listen to you, and we will continue to do so. While we cannot always deliver on what every single member would like, we carefully weigh the information available to us at the time to make the best decision possible given our goals, principles, and constraints. 

The Chief Negotiator, Tina Zappile, meets weekly throughout the academic year and summer with the university’s designated labor relations person – right now, that is Gerry Lorentz, Associate Provost for Academic Affairs. Our SFT negotiating team meets regularly and as needed to review proposals and counterproposals, discuss the priorities and needs of our members, and more. The entire SFT negotiating team is also present at negotiating sessions with management – these are scheduled throughout the year, and are sporadic, depending on what we’re actively negotiating at the moment.

The bargaining process starts when one side issues a demand to negotiate. Typically, the side that issues a demand will send the first proposal, but that’s not always the case. Once a first draft is circulated, the other side then meets to review it, makes decisions about what to accept and what to counter, marks it up accordingly, and then sends it back as a new draft. And that same process continues until an agreement is reached. “Table sessions” include a mix of formal bargaining and informal discussions where we learn more about each other’s interests and positions.

The principles that guide us are numerous, the primary ones being getting people paid fairly for their work, advocating for decent work conditions, and “good faith bargaining”. The union covers terms and conditions of our jobs, which we interpret broadly in higher education in NJ, and at Stockton University. We work hard to be good partners with other campus governing bodies and to protect and advocate for you at all times.

I recently participated in a daylong Grievance Officer training held by AFT-National, attended by my fellow Grievance Officers from New Jersey locals across the state. Rather than offering a report-back on the granular details of the training (I doubt you’re eager to hear how we handle a Step One hearing in a formal grievance), I’d instead like to zero in on an introductory remark made by the facilitator that stuck with me.

She shared that each Union should have dedicated activists, at least a small handful of them. Activists. People who, should labor matters reach a place of absolute urgency, would be able to mobilize at least ten fellow union members around appropriate advocacy and wins for our members.

It got me thinking: what is an activist in the context of higher ed labor issues? And what would it really mean to mobilize membership, especially when the forces of capital seem eager to take an axe to the very structures of public higher education?

I’ve done a great deal of political organizing outside of our Union, typically around issues of US militarism and foreign policy, and in my experience, the best comrades in these struggles are those who—cliché incoming—have read deeply on the issues and understand their historical and political contexts.

Cultivating a strong cadre of SFT activists relies on the same. Our union succeeds only if we have a cohort of folks who are intimately aware of contemporary and historical labor issues, pitfalls in Union organizing, and the rampant history of Union-busting in the US. People who’d join me for a book club on Blue Collar Empire (which I just finished, and loved) or The Last Great Strike (next on my list), those who read Labor Notes and have a Tabitha Arnold tapestry in their house and have followed the rise of New Jersey’s own labor star Chris Smalls.

Labor nerds, in other words. 

In our current juncture in higher ed, this is of paramount importance. The recent news of buyout agreements at Stockton has some of our members excited to right-size our budget, but others concerned that this is a harbinger of impending austerity. Higher ed buyouts have at times been the first step in a fast-moving process of restructuring universities: real estate deals and public-private partnerships (that death knell that often signals the selling off of the university for parts) can follow in rapid succession.

Still, unlike many of our colleagues in higher ed across the country navigating university downsizing, we are well-situated. We have a strong union with high membership rates, the basic skeleton for what we need to win. It is now up to us, the membership, to know how to leverage this infrastructure and protect our institution through the rough waters of fiscal instability that lie ahead.

With our current statewide contract set to expire on July 1, 2027, AFT locals across the state are preparing for statewide contract negotiations. With help from The Council of New Jersey State College Locals, SFT 2275 and the ten other locals in our bargaining unit have begun the first step: holding a set of “Conversation Cafes.”

We held five of these Conversation Cafes at Stockton over the past month, one each for adjunct faculty; professional staff; NTTP faculty; faculty librarians, and tenured, non-tenured, and part-time faculty. Those who attended shared what was on their minds as we approach negotiations, including the successes and shortcomings of our current contract, and what they’d like to see our next contract cover. We thank you, members, for engaging in the process and starting us off on strong, democratic footing.

Our next step: the Council World Cafe, Sunday, April 26, at the American Hotel in Freehold, NJ. Here, members of our bargaining unit will gather to parse the results of the Conversation Cafes, searching for commonalities as a starting point for statewide negotiations. If you’re interested in attending, please RSVP.

In the meantime, if you have any questions, please reach out to any of the SFT executives.

Each year, the union’s finances are reviewed by a committee of our members – the Financial Review Committee. We aren’t required to undergo a formal audit due to our membership size; those are only required of AFT affiliates with more than 1,000 members. They spend time looking at our records, including our bank accounts, deposits, expenses, deposits, record keeping, etc. Our committee recently finished the review of our 2024-2025 financial year and their report is below.

Greetings all, please enjoy the new format for the SFT Newsletter. If you notice any errors or omissions, or have feedback on the design, please reach out. We want this newsletter to be accessible and work well on as many devices as possible.

Please email me at [email protected]